Since Psalm 22 was written a thousand years before Jesus, your paper may not even mention Jesus.
Remember, determine what the message the original writer had in mind.
If you use resources, here are some ideas.
Definitely check class summaries Week 4 and 5, and notes in your class Bible under Psalm 22
See also
- Intro to psalms
NT Wright on Psalm 22- Exposition on Psalm 22 (PDF)
- :
Dave's sermon:
"The Lord Be With You...Even When He’s Not!"
Psalm 22 - Wikipedia
----
Psalm 22 possible chiasm: Death is off the table.
Psalm 22 – “My God, My God, Why hast Thou Forsaken Me?:
.This Psalm has 2 parts. The first part is a chiasmus. The second part is not.The chiasmus has a famous beginning (“My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken Me?”), a good center, and a nice end.Here’s a basic outline of the chiasmus:
A: A cry for help: no answerB: IsraelC: Personal (an “I/me” section)D: Bulls, lion, bonesE: Dogs, ‘pierce’, bonesF: A prayer for God’s helpE’: - , sword, dogD’: – , lion, oxenC’: Personal (an “I/me” section)B’: IsraelA’: Cried for help: heardI particularly like the connections through D2, E2′, E’2”, and D’2” : … think ‘sharp’, as in e.g., ’teeth’, as in ‘open lion’s mouth’.Interestingly, D3 and E3′ (“bones”) have been left unmatched in E’ and D’. I wonder why? Is it because of the section’s closer association with death? If so, then ‘death’ is absent in the latter sections. … Death is off the table. Life is in play … ?..
--
This Psalm has 2 parts. The first part is a chiasmus. The second part is not.
The chiasmus has a famous beginning (“My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken Me?”), a good center, and a nice end.
Here’s a basic outline of the chiasmus:
A: A cry for help: no answer
B: Israel
C: Personal (an “I/me” section)
D: Bulls, lion, bones
E: Dogs, ‘pierce’, bones
F: A prayer for God’s help
E’: – , sword, dog
D’: – , lion, oxen
C’: Personal (an “I/me” section)
B’: Israel
A’: Cried for help: heard
I particularly like the connections through
D2, E2′, E’2”, and D’2” : … think ‘sharp’, as in e.g., ‘teeth’, as in
‘open lion’s mouth’.
Interestingly, D3 and E3′ (“bones”) have
been left unmatched in E’ and D’. I wonder why? Is it because of the
section’s closer association with death? If so, then ‘death’ is absent
in the latter sections. … Death is off the table. Life is in play … ?
Note how D begins with the idea of being
surrounded and encircled. The paralleling and chiastic sections D, E,
E’ and D’ then proceed to do just that. They surround the individual at
the center of the chiasmus. … The structure illustrates what’s being
said. Nice.
Section C is complex. a and b are negative,
while b’ and a’ are positive. … In particular I like the i/i’ match
in b where i refers to sneering, while i’ delivers the actual content of
the sneer. The content is chiastic as well. Once again, well done.
–
The second part nicely builds through space and time. Overall, it seems to build and cover everything.
I like this chiasmus.
It’s an important Psalm, in part, because of it’s connection to Jesus’ crucifixion.
____
.